🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are watching with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a rising group of nations are moving toward similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that phones and apps are "robbing our kids' youth". A law could be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has called on the legislature to pass a proposal lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged families to prevent their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a good starting point," said a leading parliamentarian driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "based on robust research".

Previously, momentum grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a young person who died after encountering dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are appropriate and fit for children," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, action is primarily unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning under-14s from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a rule restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further access requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures demanding adult authorization for teenagers to open social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from some figures to copy Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Beyond Europe and the US, other countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global bodies adopt a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The body points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in safety.

While this global conversation continues, the actions of this nation and its followers show that policymakers around the world are increasingly willing to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.